In two weeks, Missouri voters will have the chance to remedy one of truckers’ great pet peeves – the diversion of fuel tax and other road user taxes to non-highway uses.

Constitution Amendment No. 3, which is on the state’s ballot for Nov. 2, would require “all revenues from the existing motor vehicle fuel tax (less collection costs) be used only for state and local highways, roads and bridges.”

The amendment would also use all other vehicle taxes and fees to pay off the state’s highway bonds.

OOIDA has long opposed spending fuel taxes and vehicle fees for non-highway purposes.

Opponents of Amendment 3 contend the plan would divert money from other state programs, such as education and health care, both of which receive a portion of vehicle sales taxes. In an editorial, The Kansas City Star, one of the state’s largest newspapers, has encouraged voters to reject Amendment 3 for that reason.

However, the newspaper pointed out on its editorial page that Amendment 3 would also take $30 million in fuel tax now diverted to non-highway state duties and return it to highway uses – an action the newspaper says it endorses.

Missouri’s highways and highway funding have been a political bone of contention for years.

Many of the highways are showing their age, and the state’s Department of Transportation reneged in recent years on a 1992 promise to build a four-lane divided highway to every community in the state with over 5,000 population. Even though the department abandoned the plan, it kept the tax that supported it.

In addition, state officials recently proposed the idea of adding tolls to increase the number of lanes on Interstate 70, the main east-west route between the St. Louis and Kansas City metropolitan areas. The state’s constitution forbids tolling, and voters in Missouri have twice rejected proposals to change that provision.

– By Mark H. Reddig, associate editor
mark_reddig@landlinemag.com