OOIDA wants the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to amend a recent
proposal that shields motor carriers from liability when they provide inaccurate
information as part of the truck driver background check process.
Congress in 1994 directed FMCSA to provide additional previous
driver safety
data to be investigated by prospective employers — from all previous
employers going back three years. The Hazardous Materials Transportation
Authorization Act required employers to provide this information.
In Sept. 26 comments, OOIDA said the agency should be concerned that
inaccurate, outdated or imprecise data is often collected and distributed,
which ends up
unfairly damaging a driver’s ability to find work.
For example, some irresponsible carriers even manipulate background check
information to retaliate against or blackball safe drivers who refuse
pressure to violate
safety rules — most notably hours-of-service regulations.
But when that happens, the proposed rule actually protects the carrier
from liability. In fact, the rule emphasizes carriers’ supposed fear of their exposure
to legal liability — just for following the rules.
“OOIDA finds this fear suspect and vastly overstated,” the association,
in its comments to FMCSA, said. “We don’t understand why any carrier
would express any fear of liability unless they know or believe the information
they are using is false, or that they are engaged in improper use of
such information.”
Suggested
improvements
Some suggested changes OOIDA would like to see:
Drivers should have the right to review a safety performance
history at any time — not just during the hiring process, as the proposed
rule suggests. The current rule provides no meaningful ability
to correct an inaccurate record.
FMCSA should limit background investigations to information directly
related to a driver’s safety qualifications under federal law; and
to require the information reported be made with sufficient
detail to ensure accuracy.
The carrier should be required to verify and attest that the
information it transmits is true and that safety performances
should relate only
to the driver’s history with that carrier.
In addition, there should be some guidance as to whether the previous
carrier should be required to delete any information older than three years
from its records or from records it received from other carriers.
The prospective employer should automatically give the driver a copy
of any background information it receives; and FMCSA should require written
authorization from a driver before a carrier begins a background check. Without
such knowledge, the driver will not know when his or her rights to review,
attempt to correct or rebut the information have been triggered.
A former carrier should be given seven days, instead of the proposed
30 days, to respond to a driver’s attempt to correct or rebut employment
information, so the driver can quickly begin working.
— by Dick Larsen, senior editor
Dick Larsen can be reached at dlarsen@landlinemag.com.